Ethiopia is on the brink of a significant political transformation as proposed constitutional reforms could merge the roles of prime minister and president. This shift may grant Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed even greater authority, consolidating power within the executive branch. While supporters argue that a stronger presidency could unify Ethiopia’s diverse ethnic groups, critics warn that such centralisation risks fostering authoritarianism.
The proposed reforms come after a national dialogue involving around 4,000 delegates, yet key opposition groups were notably absent from these discussions. This raises concerns about the legitimacy of the process and whether it truly reflects the will of the Ethiopian populace. Critics, including civil rights activists, highlight that the current political institutions lack broad popular support, questioning the democratic validity of any changes made.
Abiy’s government has already faced scrutiny for its handling of elections and ongoing conflicts, particularly in regions like Tigray, Oromia, and Amhara. The potential for a presidential system to emerge from this context may not address the underlying issues of governance and representation that Ethiopia faces. As the political landscape evolves, the implications of these reforms could have lasting effects on the country’s stability and democratic processes.
Ultimately, the proposed constitutional changes could formalise the existing concentration of power rather than genuinely redistribute it. With the absence of significant opposition voices in the dialogue, many fear that the reforms may serve to entrench Abiy’s authority rather than foster a more inclusive political environment.
Source: DW News
